The Middle Passage
At some point, the deal breaks.
Unknowingly we signed an agreement growing up: play by the rules, keep our heads down, mean well and the universe will hand over its fair share.
Psychologist James Hollis calls this the “tacit contract with the universe.” It describes the way in which we expect (or perhaps hope) that our good behaviour will guarantee a secure, predictable outcome, adopting personas to survive and meet societal expectations–dampening parts of our character and intensifying others in an effort to tick the right boxes.
And then the floor gives way.
Effort goes in and the reward never arrives. The self we constructed to please others fails to sustain ourselves, leaving a sense of existential dread. This rupture, familiar to many, is what Hollis refers to as The Middle Passage, understood widely as a midlife crisis.
General consensus is that this is a temporary panic: a moment of madness where we buy a motorbike or take a sabbatical to Thailand before regaining our senses. Instead, Hollis suggests this is an unavoidable transition from the somewhat naive, rule-following existence into true adulthood.
The realisation that the world does not operate on a reward system for good behaviour is destabilising and requires introspection, resolve and agency to overcome without resignation.
By extension this is a continuation of stoic thought that’s seeped into mainstream betterment culture in recent years–an extrapolation of the alpha sentiment that “nobody is coming to save you” or, less controversially and more beautifully, Sartre’s line that we, as humans, are “condemned to be free.”
The Friction of Expectation
As this tacit contract disintegrates, the default response is friction and resentment. We hunt for a villain. We wait for circumstances to improve or someone to finally recognise our efforts. We enviously scowl at the success of others, explaining their wins backwards through privilege or luck, dismissing the Q Factor of it all.
We treat our exhaustion as an unexpected error in the machine, rather than a glaring signal that our model of the world has broken down.
Resistance is expensive. Spending our days wishing our environment will change acts as a continuous load, locking our nervous system in a state of passive threat, grasping at solutions from a position of zero leverage, outsourcing our agency to our surroundings.
This chronic friction drains capacity before we’ve stepped into the demands of the actual day. The system remains elevated, struggling to regulate.
Reclaiming Leverage
Hollis provides the framework for stepping out of the trap:
"The capacity for growth depends on one's ability to internalize and to take personal responsibility. If we forever see our life as a problem caused by others, a problem to be 'solved,' then no change will occur."
Taking ownership alters how the nervous system processes demand. Responsibility grounds the system. Dropping the expectation of external rescue removes the friction of resistance.
Thriving on the other side of The Middle Passage demands absolute psychological responsibility–A relinquishing of the idea that someone else will heal our wounds. Perhaps the world will hand us a softer ride, but we should expect a rough one. Allocate our resources entirely towards what we have the power to control. Hollis’ brilliant work builds on Stoicism and Adlerian thought to reframe our energy and potential.
As Jung, the intellectual forefather of Hollis so rightly said:
"I am not what happened to me; I am what I choose to become."
Leave a comment